AMD’s New EPYC 7F52 Reviewed: The Farreneheit is for ᴴᴵᴳᴴ Regularity

0
315
AMD’s New EPYC 7F52 Reviewed: The Farreneheit is for ᴴᴵᴳᴴ Regularity

Everyone desires a fast processor. The opportunity to get more stuff completed is one of a variety of guiding principles associated with business. However , company also needs uniformity, safety and security, which is why getting enterprise-class processors is usually a requirement in the back-end infrastructure. These cpus, with lots of cores, aren’t as fast as consumer cpus, so it becomes a tussle whether it makes sense to visit fast without protection, or to play this safe with a verified platform. With AMD’s new 7F cpus, the aim is to supply that proven system with super-fast cores with lots of cache. We’ve got the 7F52 in for testing nowadays.

The Organization Market Wants This All

The character of enterprise cpus in recent decades has tended in the direction of more cores and much more cache. As strength budgets have improved, in order to ensure balance and get the best performance points, the solution continues to be to add more cores. However , there are still marketplaces that want high rate of recurrence components, and very often users will look from consumer hardware, which usually doesn’t offer the trimmings of the enterprise entire world, such as ECC memory space, RAS features, administration, and high-speed IO. We’ve seen Oes build servers upon super rare ‘consumer-grade?? processors, like the auction-only 5 GHz 14-core parts that offer the maximum of performance, yet fall down on simple enterprise features, for example ECC memory.

To that finish, AMD’s Enterprise department has been developing a few high-frequency processors inside its EPYC type of hardware to address the forex market. We saw using the first generation ‘Naples?? EPYC processors ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES come out with a special EPYC 7371 processor, which usually offered 16 cores but had +700 MHz on the foundation frequency and +900 MHz on the turbocharged frequency compared to the following best 16-core component, and the tradeoff had been only +30 Watts of power plus paying a bit additional. At the time the EPYC 7371, which was released several months after the remaining product line, was a check run for psychological new line of 7F ‘high frequency?? cpus.

AMD 7F and 7H: Concentrating on High Performance

The best way to consider AMD’s EPYC processor series, especially for the second era ‘Rome?? hardware, is within four segments.

First is the major stack. These are the standard processors for the majority from the market, from the 7252 with eight cores all the way up to the 7742 with 64 cores. These are all dual-socket compatible, and are any where from 155 W in order to 225 W (except the 7252 plus 7262 which are 120 W).

AMD EPYC 7002 ‘Rome’ Processors (2P)
Cores

Threads

Frequency (GHz)L3TDPPrice
BaseMax
EPYC 774264 / 1282. 253. 40256 MB225 W$6950
EPYC 770264 or 1282. 003. 35256 MB200 W$6450
EPYC 764248 / 962. 303. 20256 MB225 W$4775
EPYC 755248 / 962. 203. 30192 MB200 W$4025
EPYC 754232 and 642. 903. 40128 MB225 W$3400
EPYC 750232 / 642. 503. 35128 MB200 W$2600
EPYC 745232 and 642. 353. 35128 MB155 W$2025
EPYC 740224 / 482. 803. 35128 MB155 W$1783
EPYC 735224 / 482. 303. 20128 MB180 W$1350
EPYC 730216 or 323. 003. 30128 MB155 W$978
EPYC 728216 / 322. 803. 2064 MB120 W$650
EPYC 727212 / 242. 903. 2064 MB155 W$625
EPYC 72628 and 163. 203. 40128 MB120 W$575
EPYC 72528 / 163. 103. 2064 MB120 W$475

Second are the single outlet processors. These are variations of the main collection but designated having a P at the end, as they are built for techniques that only require just one processor. The benefit the following is that the P cpus are actually cheaper ($2600 for the 32-core 7502 compared to $2300 for your 7502P) if the client can guarantee they will never need a dual outlet design. These furthermore go from almost eight cores all the way as much as 64 cores.

AMD EPYC 7002 Rome Processors (1P)
Cores

Threads

Frequency (GHz)L3TDPPrice
BaseMax
EPYC 7702P64 / 1282. 003. 35256 MB200 W$4425
EPYC 7502P32 / 642. 503. 35128 MB200 W$2300
EPYC 7402P24 and 482. 803. 35128 MB200 W$1250
EPYC 7302P16 / 323. 003. 30128 MB155 W*$825
EPYC 7232P8 / 163. 103. 2032 MB120 W$450
*170W TDP mode furthermore available

Third could be the 7H family of cpus, which as it appears only has a single member right now. It was launched a couple of months following the first two sections, and the ‘H?? means High Performance Computing. The strength limits of this nick has increased up to 280 W, and the objective is to drive an increased sustained frequency compared to regular parts. For instance , the 7742 includes a base frequency associated with 2 . 25 Gigahertz at 225W, however the 7H12 has a bottom frequency of second . 60 GHz in 280 W. The particular 7H processors aren’t on general store as far as we can inform, but specific clients can request all of them.

AMD EPYC 7H Rome Cpus (1P)
Cores

Threads

Frequency (GHz)L3TDPPrice
BaseMax
EPYC 7H1264 and 1282. 603. 30256 MB280$?

Fourth will be the newest set of equipment, the 7F loved ones. The F in cases like this is for Frequency, that parts are religious successors to the 7371 in the last generation: much more base frequency as well as a lot higher turbocharged for the consumer to make use of. AMD is also equipping these processors with a lot of cache, so the cache per core may effectively quadruple.

There are 3 members to the Ancient rome 7F family:

AMD EPYC 7F Rome Processors (1P)
Cores

Threads

Frequency (GHz)L3TDPChipletsCores

per

CCX

Price
BaseMax
EPYC 7F7224 or 483. 203. 70192 MB240 W62$2450
EPYC 7F5216 / 323. 503. 90256 MB225 W81$3100
EPYC 7F328 / 163. 703. 90128 MB180 W41$2100

These processors do appear a little confusing.

For the 6 core 7F32 as well as the 16 core 7F52, AMD is allowing 1 core for each CCX, or two cores per chiplet, which means the equivalent of 16 MB of L3 cache per primary. This is four situations as much as what every other AMD EPYC processor chip gets.

The 24 core 7F72 is cheaper compared to 16 core, since AMD is modifying the level of cache available here to 192 MB. This means that this particular processor only offers six of the 8 chiplets active, every CCX will have 2 cores active (6 chiplets two CCX per chiplet 2 cores per CCX sama dengan 24). The regularity is a little bit decrease because of the increased energetic core density, therefore along with the decreased cache, AMD felt the necessity to price this one beneath that of the 7F52.

For this review, we’re testing the 7F52 processors. Compared to the bottom 7302 16-core that will AMD offers, what this means is another +500 Megahertz on the base regularity, and +600 Megahertz on the turbo rate of recurrence, but also going up through 155 W in order to 225 W.

Naturally some of the crucial comparison points for that 7F52 CPU will be equivalent 16-core CPUs from Intel, like the new Xeon Precious metal 6226R, or evaluations to 28/32 primary options from each Intel and ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES.

7F52 2P Comparison Points
AMD

7F52 (2P)

AMD

7601

AnandTechIntel

8280

Intel

6226R (2P)

2 by 16 / 3232 / 64Cores / Threads28 / 562 x 16 / 32
35002200Base Frequency27002900
39003200Turbo Frequency40003900
2 x 256 MB64 MBL3 Cache38. five MB2 by 22 MB
DDR4-3200DDR4-2666DRAM SupportDDR4-2933DDR4-2933
2 TB / socket2 TBDRAM Capacity1 TB1 TB or socket
2 x 240 W180 WTDP205 W2 x 150 W
2 x $3100$4200Price$100082 x $1300

In our tests today, we’re using Supermicro’s H11DSi motherboard for testing the 2P EPYC processors, the ASRock Rack EPYCD8 for the 1P configurations, the ASUS WS C621E SAGE for 2P Xeon, and the ASUS ROG Dominus Extreme for 1P Xeon. Many thanks to Kingston for supplying memory for this review, as well as Micron for both memory and storage, Corsair for the power supplies, and Noctua for the coolers.

Frequency Ramp, Latency and Power